Independent Directors in Nigeria: Myth or Reality?

Independent directors have gained much traction in the corporate governance scene of developed countries. This category of directors, who are not specifically provided for in company statutes, has emerged as the bedrock of sound corporate governance entrenchment in companies. This is evident from the fact that contemporary corporate governance codes contain enormous provisions on independent directors. The main issues usually provided for in such corporate governance codes include the following:


(a)           Definition of the term “independent director”: This is a very important provision for so many reasons. In the first place, since the expression is usually lacking in company law statutes, it becomes inevitable that the corporate governance code should provide for this. Secondly, there appears not to be a uniformity in the criteria for the determination of the independent status of a director.

(b)          Role and responsibilities of independent directors: For independent directors to be specifically provided for in contemporary corporate governance codes, there must be special roles reserved for them which other directors are either incapable of carrying out or unsuitable for. These special roles and responsibilities are usually stipulated in the corporate governance codes which provide for independent directors.

(c)           Numerical strength on boards of directors: The number of independent directors required to be on the board is also usually indicated, either in absolute terms or as a percentage of the board size of the company concerned. The importance of such a provision lies in the fact that some critical mass is necessary if independent directors are to be effective in the discharge of their reserved responsibilities.

(d)          Identification in annual reports of companies: It is important that those directors adjudged to be independent are really and truly independent. Consequently, it is usually provided in corporate governance codes that independent directors are clearly indicated in the annual reports of companies. This will enable anybody who has any information on why a director who is listed in the annual report as being independent may be considered otherwise. This engenders transparency and enhances the utility of the practice.

(e)           Separate meetings for independent directors: As already indicated, independent directors have special roles reserved for them. Some of these roles are in most cases in conflict with the interests of other directors. Thus, it is the practice to formally provide for independent directors to hold meetings in which only independent directors are present. This would enable them to freely and fully discuss issues before them without any “intimidation or interference” from other directors. These meetings, often referred to as “executive sessions” in some cases involves all non-executive directors.

(f)           Access to external professional advice: In the discharge of there responsibilities, independent directors may feel the need to procure independent external advice on some matters under consideration by them. It is best practice to authorise independent directors, and indeed all directors, to seek external professional advice on matters being considered by them at the expense of the company. Surely, such external professional advice will enhance the quality of their performance. Thus, such permissions are usually provided for in contemporary corporate governance codes.

In Nigeria, independent directors are also recognised. This is evident from the provisions of all the four corporate governance codes presently in force in the country. This is so in spite of the fact that the Companies and Allied Matters Act, Cap. C20, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 2004, which is the principal company law legislation in the country is silent on independent directors. This gives the impression that independent directorship is a reality in Nigeria. Do mere provisions in corporate governance code tantamount to independent directorship being a reality in Nigeria? I do not think so. The nature of those provisions must be scrutinised to determine their adequacies in delivering the expected result before such a conclusion can be reached.

In truth, the provisions of all the corporate governance codes in Nigeria do not match up on a dispassionate evaluation. They are all laden with numerous inadequacies which are clear hindrances to the provisions achieving the purpose for which independent directors are required to be on the boards of public companies. These inadequacies in the provisions of the different corporate governance codes in force in Nigeria are of varying degrees, depending on the corporate governance code under consideration. These inadequacies are obvious on a scrupulous evaluation of the provisions of these corporate governance codes vis-à-vis the six items enumerated above which are provided for in the corporate governance codes of other jurisdictions. These issues shall be treated in greater details in subsequent posts.

Nonetheless, these inadequacies are pointers to the fact that at present independent directorship is still a myth in Nigeria. Little wonder therefore that their impact is neither felt nor appreciated. Besides, there are other cultural considerations which are having huge negative impact on the practice of independent directorship in Nigeria. It is, therefore, undoubtedly manifest that independent directors are not yet real in Nigeria. The provisions on independent directors underscore the need to have them on the boards of contemporary, forward-looking companies. However, there is a real need for a huge shift in mindset to enable the practice to be well-entrenched in Nigeria. This will enable Nigerian companies to begin to reap the bountiful harvests that are necessarily incidental to having independent directors on the boards of such companies.

Independent Directors: 111 Frequently Asked Questions Aptly Answered

What is your view on independent directors in Nigeria? Do you agree that there are inadequacies in the law and practice of independent directorship in Nigeria? You may wish to share your views on independent directors with users of this website. Please do so at the comments section of this post. However, to comment on this post, you must be a registered user of this website. Registration is simple and FREE. If you are already a registered user, you have to log in to comment on this post.


Posted in Corporate Governance Tagged with: , , ,
3 comments on “Independent Directors in Nigeria: Myth or Reality?
  1. Mayowa Awosika says:

    As you rightly pointed out above and in some of your published papers, the four Nigerian corporate governance codes that provide for the position of independent director in Nigeria are fraught with inadequacies. You have however discussed the bulk of the inadequacies in your papers. The implication of the shortcomings is that, Nigeria, in terms of regulatory provision for independent director,has a long way to go.

    However, on the attitude of companies to the independent directors in Nigeria, it is extremely difficult to say that companies have been receptive to the idea of independent directors in Nigeria. A look at the websites of major companies including but not limited to banks and insurance companies supports this view. Despite that the codes in prescribing the number of independent directors required on a board of director, used the word ‘minimum’, most companies have the required minimum on board. In fact, a bank has no independent director on board. This goes a long way to show that the companies do not have a positive attitude towards independent directors. It further goes to show that the companies are only complying with the requirements of the codes but if given an option they might not have any independent director. The reason for this attitude is yet to be ascertained. But could it be that the advantages associated with independent directors are unknown to them? or is it that there is a fear that independent director would do a lot of digging which could cause a lot of upset?

    Other factors that make the position of an independent director a myth is the amount of time spent during the directorial job of a company. While there is no data with regards the amount of time spent by directors in Nigeria, in USA, it has been said that directors meet around eight times a year. This has been declared to be grossly inadequate for any meaningful contributions.
    There are the challenges of information and knowledge as well. The information used by an independent director is sourced from the management and these might be inadequate. In a typical Nigerian settings that the body language towards independent directors has been that of tolerance, then, management would not have any problems providing inadequate information to independent directors.
    To understand the information passed to the independent director there is a need for knowledge in the field but how many independent directors are very knowledgeable in the industry they are serving as independent directors?
    for now, it appears independent director is more of a myth than reality in Nigeria.

  2. Nat OFO says:

    You have clearly identified some of the main challenges of independent directorship in Nigeria. No doubt, the concept is yet to sink into the fabrics of corporate governance in Nigeria. With the challenges identified, the issue can be well-addressed. The role of the regulators in this regard cannot be over-emphasised. Thanks for your valuable comments, Mayowa.

  3. linda says:

    Independent directors in nigeria is a myth and not a reality for the following reasons-
    1. There is no statutory recognition-company law does not recognise degrees of directors,equal obligation on ALL directors to act in the best interest of the company.section 279(6) of CAMA.
    2.Achieving board independence through independent directors’ ability to exercise objective judgement in corporate matters is a mirage.
    3.Implementation of the rules on independence directors is questionable-reactive and not proactive.
    4.Lack of independence in the office of independent directors.
    5. Faculty appointment-still by the board and ratified the AGM-Appointed from impartial source.
    6. Compounded by lack of knowledge,lack of time, information and no personal motivation.
    7. Independent directors are expected to protect minority shareholders-Diminish the perceived independence of independent directors.
    8. Exclusion of ex-executives-Throwing away valuable experience?
    However there is a tale of four codes which makes provosions for corporate governance in Nigeria making for no uniformities in the criteria for determination of independent status of a is hardly open to question that, properly implemented, the independent directorship framework may add significant value to corporate management.
    Finally, to be a good independent director-non executive directors and to be sound in judgement and to have an inquiring mind. They should question intelligently,debate constructively, challenge rigorously and decide dispassionately,and they should listen sensitively to the views of others inside and outside the board…. But this is hard to achieve in a corrupt country like Nigeria.
    I hope my above opinion is convincing that independent directorship in nigeria is a myth.THANKS

1 Pings/Trackbacks for "Independent Directors in Nigeria: Myth or Reality?"
  1. […] In the past couple of weeks, we have been discussing the inadequacies in the provisions of the corporate governance codes presently in force in Nigeria as far as independent directorship is concerned [see here and here]. […]

Leave a Reply